pracina: (pic#)
ᴀʀᴜɴ / ᴀᴍᴀᴅᴇᴏ / ᴀʀᴍᴀɴᴅ ([personal profile] pracina) wrote in [personal profile] followups 2024-07-26 09:32 am (UTC)

A subtle thing in Armand's expression that indicates: no, Daniel doesn't have to spell it out.

But it does seem to take a moment to sink in, this specific angle. Re-calibration, happening fast beneath the mostly-still surface, and he doesn't get much of a chance to do so when Daniel pivots to a question, and a one-worded one at that. Maybe Armand had been expecting something more along the lines of because you need to fuck off forever.

Which doesn't neatly align with Daniel having already accepted a gift before, with a gift in return, with a written letter delivered to his people inviting some sort of beginning, but it's been a disorienting time.

So. Why? An instinct to start with 'perhaps,' as though his own motives are a fun mystery they can solve together, just like old times. He bites it back.

"I wanted to give you something I didn't think you would seek for yourself," finally. "But that you would like. And I wanted to provoke you."

Both things can be true.

"Given your response, I don't know that I was successful on either front."

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting